Wikipedia:Trivial mentions

In this article, we will explore the topic of Wikipedia:Trivial mentions and its relevance today. From its origins to its impact on modern society, Wikipedia:Trivial mentions has been a topic of debate and study for experts from various disciplines. Through detailed analysis, we will examine the different facets of Wikipedia:Trivial mentions, from its influence on popular culture to its role in politics and economics. With a critical and objective view, this article will seek to provide a complete vision of Wikipedia:Trivial mentions and its importance in the contemporary world.

The general notability guideline clearly states that sources that only contain a "trivial mention" of a topic are insufficient to establish that topic's notability.

Summary

Wikipedia articles need to include verifiable evidence of the topic's notability from reliable independent sources. The guideline states that these sources need to provide "significant coverage" of the topic, and this coverage must consist of more than a "trivial mention".

Quotes from WP:Notability

The general notability guideline states that:

  • "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."

The meaning of significant coverage is explained:

  • "'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material."

A bullet point indicates the meaning of trivial mention using an example:

  • "Martin Walker's statement, in a newspaper article about Bill Clinton, that 'In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice' is plainly a trivial mention of that band."

Related essays