Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures

Today we want to talk about Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures, a topic that has captured the attention of many in recent times. Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures is a topic that covers a wide range of aspects and may be of interest to a very diverse audience. From its impact on current society to its historical relevance, Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures can be analyzed from different perspectives and find its place in various fields of knowledge. In this article we will explore some of the most relevant facets of Template talk:Life, non-cellular life, and comparable structures, to understand its importance and the implications it has today.

WikiProject iconTree of Life Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Prion

I would like to delete prion from this template, as these protein (polypeptides) particles are not living nor considered living by any fringe research group. BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it was never my intention to suggest they are living. This is where it gets pedantic: by my understanding only life can be described as living. The group 'life' is included in this template, but only includes bacteria, archae, and eukaryota. Therefore it is implied that every other item is merely a comparable organic structure, but not living. JamesDouch (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 Done Ypna (talk)

Nano-structures

Shouldn't the nanobes and nanobacteria be added to this template (... and comparable organic structers) in some way? Pinoczet (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done Ypna (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Question mark after Nanobe

Hey, Why is there a question mark after Nanobe? Is it because the classification is debated? Thank you so much! Sincerely, JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Same question. I think we should take it out or clarify what it supposed to mean.

Update: Hi, @Ypna:! It seems to be your 2020 diff. Do we need this "?" sign? Thank you. Evilfreethinker (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I added the "?" because, if I understand correctly, the nanobe hypothesis is a very controversial and tentative interpretation of fossil evidence, and in reality these structures may not actually be an example life, non-cellular life, or even a comparable structure. Ypna (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia