Template talk:Hungary topics

In today's world, Template talk:Hungary topics has become a topic of great relevance and debate in different areas. The importance of Template talk:Hungary topics has been increasing in recent years, awakening the interest of experts and professionals from different disciplines. As Template talk:Hungary topics continues to gain attention, it is crucial to understand its impact on society and explore the potential implications it has on a global level. In this article, we will delve into the meaning and importance of Template talk:Hungary topics, analyzing its relevance in different contexts and offering a broad vision of its influence today.

WikiProject iconHungary NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Coat of arms

consensus image 2009 – 21 March 2018

There has been a consensus for the last nine years (since 2009) to have a narrow coat of arms image in the right side of the template. (View a recent example of the template with the original image in this version.) On March 22, 2018, User:195.56.247.82 changed the image to one with a wider aspect ratio (including oak clusters left and right), and increased the size from 80 to 150px. (View that version here.)

Two attempts to restore the long-standing consensus image were both reverted by IP 195. I've restored the image again, and requested that per WP:BRD, the consensus image should remain until a new consensus is determined, to be worked out here on the Talk page.

My view is that we should either stick to the original, tall-and-skinny image, or have no image at all. The new image is nearly double the size of the old one (despite the odd edit summary claiming it isn't), and it takes up a lot of width in this growing template, leaving less room for the links and stretching the template longer in the vertical direction.

My preference would be for no image, as I view nav templates as being densely populated by links for navigation. As this template has a growing number of links, my feeling is that the wider image takes up too much screen real estate, reducing the amount of row width available for nav links, and leaving a wide, empty column on the right, where the image is. But if we are going to have an image, then at least have a skinny image, sort of like the one that was there before, so that it leaves plenty of room for the links, which is what a nav template is all about. Mathglot (talk) 05:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Notifications:
Mathglot (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Agree, it looks better with the smaller image. I like it with the image, instead of without it. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)