Talk:Squirtle/GA1
In today's world, Talk:Squirtle/GA1 has gained unprecedented relevance. Whether in the workplace, academic, cultural or social sphere, Talk:Squirtle/GA1 has become a topic of general interest that arouses curiosity and the need for understanding. This phenomenon has generated endless debates, research and reflections around its impact and relevance in contemporary society. In this article, we will explore in depth the different aspects related to Talk:Squirtle/GA1, from its historical origins to its implications in people's daily lives. Through a detailed analysis, we seek to shed light on this topic and offer new perspectives that allow us to understand its importance in today's world.
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 14:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Might as well claim this too. :D TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 14:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TrademarkedTWOrantula: Are you still planning to do this review? CosXZ (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Dang it. I may have bit more than I could chew here. I'd rather let this go, as this is kind of getting in the way of my life. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 01:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
|
7. Overall assessment. | |