In today's article, we will explore 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles and its impact on today's world in detail. From its origin to its evolution today, 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has played a crucial role in different aspects of daily life. Over the years, 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has sparked great interest and debate, generating multiple perspectives and opinions that have shaped its meaning and relevance in society. From his impact on popular culture to his influence on technology and science, 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has left an indelible mark on the contemporary landscape. In this article, we will explore how 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has shaped the world we live in and what its implications are for the future.
Singles | |
---|---|
2006 Tennis Masters Cup | |
Champion | Roger Federer |
Runner-up | James Blake |
Score | 6–0, 6–3, 6–4 |
Draw | 8 |
Roger Federer defeated James Blake in the final, 6–0, 6–3, 6–4 to win the singles tennis title at the 2006 Tennis Masters Cup. It was his third Tour Finals title.
David Nalbandian was the defending champion, but was defeated in the semifinals by Blake.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
1 | Roger Federer | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||
2 | Rafael Nadal | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
1 | Roger Federer | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
8 | James Blake | 0 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
8 | James Blake | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
7 | David Nalbandian | 4 | 1 |
Federer | Ljubičić | Roddick | Nalbandian | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
1 | Roger Federer | 7–6(7–2), 6–4 | 4–6, 7–6(10–8), 6–4 | 3–6, 6–1, 6–1 | 3–0 | 6–2 (75.00%) |
45–34 | 1 | |
4 | Ivan Ljubičić | 6–7(2–7), 4–6 | 4–6, 7–6(11–9), 1–6 | 5–7, 7–6(9–7), 7–5 | 1–2 | 3–5 (37.50%) |
41–49 | 4 | |
5 | Andy Roddick | 6–4, 6–7(8–10), 4–6 | 6–4, 6–7(9–11), 6–1 | 2–6, 6–7(4–7) | 1–2 | 3–5 (37.50%) |
42–42 | 3 | |
7 | David Nalbandian | 6–3, 1–6, 1–6 | 7–5, 6–7(7–9), 5–7 | 6–2, 7–6(7–4) | 1–2 | 4–4 (50.00%) |
39–42 | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Nadal | Davydenko | Robredo | Blake | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
2 | Rafael Nadal | 5–7, 6–4, 6–4 | 7–6(7–2), 6–2 | 4–6, 6–7(0–7) | 2–1 | 4–3 | 40–36 | 2 | |
3 | Nikolay Davydenko | 7–5, 4–6, 4–6 | 7–6(10–8), 3–6, 6–1 | 6–2, 4–6, 5–7 | 1–2 | 4–5 | 46–45 | 3 | |
6 | Tommy Robredo | 6–7(2–7), 2–6 | 6–7(8–10), 6–3, 1–6 | 6–2, 3–6, 7–5 | 1–2 | 3–5 | 37–42 | 4 | |
8 | James Blake | 6–4, 7–6(7–0) | 2–6, 6–4, 7–5 | 2–6, 6–3, 5–7 | 2–1 | 5–3 | 41–41 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.